Captain America: Civil War: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Chris Evans

Chris Evans is all smiles after looking at Captain America’s box office totals

BLess that two months ago, Warner Brothers pitted the two greatest heroes in the DC Comics universe against each other in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Not to be outdone, Disney and the Marvel superheroes have fired back, and the result is a knockout. Not only does Captain America: Civil War have many more superheroes than does its DC counterpart, it has something much more important: a sense of humor.

Civil War has a detailed and, at times, cumbersome plot that basically serves as a device to eventually pit most of the superheroes in the Marvel universe against each other. After several civilians are killed when Captain America (Chris Evans) stops terrorists in Africa from stealing a biological weapon, the United Nations wants to put the Avengers under its direct control. The Captain refuses, and when it later appears that his friend, the Winter Soldier (Sebastian Stan), is responsible for a mass bombing, Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.) heads up a team of Avengers to bring the Soldier in, even if it means taking on Captain America to do so. 

Captain America: Civil War is divided in two roughly equal halves: brooding and fighting. The movie acknowledges the enormous amounts of collateral damage resulting from the finale showdowns in previous Marvel films, and several of the heroes, most notably Iron Man, are wracked with guilt about their involvement. But, much as in Batman v Superman, it’s hard for audiences to take this as anything other than a means to a spectacular end. And the end is truly spectacular, a terrific battle royal pitting a dozen heroes against each other in and above a commercial airport runway setting that conveniently allows them to toss jets at each other with no innocent bystanders in the middle. The two most noteworthy participants in the battle are a new, actually high-school-aged Spider-Man (Tom Holland), and an easygoing Ant-Man (Paul Rudd), who reconfigures his suit to turn himself into a giant. There’s a light touch to the showdown, and, indeed all the set pieces, as directors Anthony and Joe Russo keep the quips flying along with the fists in all the action scenes. Just as important, they made a wise choice in centering Captain America around the more optimistic and youthful appearing Evans rather than the more world-weary Downey. The movie still feels a bit bloated and slow moving at times, but Captain America: Civil War is easily the most effective and entertaining of the Marvel superhero ensemble movies. 
Continue reading on Captain America: Civil War: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Keanu: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Keegan Michael Key Jordan Peele

Key and Peele won’t be getting a Peabody Award for Keanu

BThe old saying goes that you can’t make a funny movie based on a single joke. However, the comedy team of Key and Peele show in their new film Keanu that a two-joke movie can be hilarious, as long as one of the jokes involves a kitten.

The kitten in this case is named Keanu, and he winds up on the doorstep of despondent photographer Rell (Jordan Peele), whose girlfriend just dumped him. Keanu immediately lifts Rell’s spirits and gives his new owner a new lease on life, at least until he’s kitten-napped by drug dealer Cheddar (Method Man). When Rell and his cousin Clarence (Keegan-Michael Key) try to get Keanu back, they instead wind up as part of Cheddar’s crew, helping take care of the gangster’s business, including going along on a drug sale at Anna Faris‘ home.

Kittens are both adorable and hilarious, as millions of YouTube videos demonstrate, and Keanu director Peter Atencio (a veteran of the Key and Peele TV series) puts the title kitten through the wringer as it is repeatedly on hand during several bloody, slow motion shootouts among drug dealers and cops and always winds up, not only unscathed but also adopted, by Cheddar and a host of his rivals during the course of the movie. That joke always seems to work, in part because the various kittens playing Keanu are just so darn cute. In addition to kitten humor, the movie’s other running joke involves Key and Peele, perhaps the two most completely straight arrow, middle class black comics around, being mistaken by Cheddar for a pair of stone cold hitmen. The cousins try their best to live up to the roles, spouting F-bombs and N-words left and right, as they adopt their new personas as “Tectonic” and “Shark Tank.” Sometimes, the jokes work, as when Clarence instills a love of George Michael in Cheddar’s crew. And sometimes, they don’t, as with some bizarre dream sequences. In any event, the faux gangsta humor runs on too long, and little Keanu is absent for a considerable stretch in the middle of the movie. Still, Key and Peele have tremendous comic chemistry together, even when their material lags a bit. Like its title character, Keanu is a keeper.
Continue reading on Keanu: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Mother’s Day: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Jennifer Aniston

Jennifer Aniston is the best mother in Mother’s Day

C-In case anyone has forgotten, Garry Marshall got his start on television, creating The Odd Couple, Laverne & Shirleyand Mork & Mindy, among others. His latest feature film, Mother’s Day, however, recalls a different popular series. Just imagine a holiday-themed episode of The Love Boat without Issac, Julie, Gopher, and the ocean, but with Julia Roberts wearing a ridiculous Buster Brown wig instead.

Mother’s Day has several intersecting story lines, all taking place immediately before the holiday. The most prominent story concerns newly single mom Sandy (Jennifer Aniston), who is upset after her husband Henry (Timothy Olyphant) leaves her for a younger woman that her two sons take to immediately, to her chagrin. Bradley (Jason Sudeikis) is also facing his first Mother’s Day as a single parent, but he’s still unable to come to terms with his wife’s death. Then, there are sisters Jesse (Kate Hudson) and Gabi (Sarah Chalke), who have married a man from India (Aasif Mandvi) and a woman (Cameron Esposito) respectively, and must break the news to their extremely intolerant parents (Margot Martindale and Robert Pine). 

Admittedly, you wouldn’t have seen a lesbian couple on The Love Boat, but the other crises in Mother’s Day are exactly the sort that got worked out over the course of a week’s cruise en route to a huggy-feely finale. Along the way to the film’s extremely predictable ending, the script (credited to Marshall and four other screenwriters with one previous credit among them) dispenses fortune cookie philosophy (“We’re not who the world thinks we are; we decide who we are”) and a mix of decades old humor (dad-buying-tampon jokes and an out-of-control RV) with lame social media riffs (“did she just say tweet at me”). Still, Marshall was smart enough to give Jennifer Aniston the most screen time, and she wears her emotions on her sleeve, overcoming the lame one-liners and establishing the one credible parent-child dynamic in the movie. The other effective (and generally funny) performer is British comic Jack Whitehall, who enters an open-mike comedy competition using some genuinely funny and heartfelt one-liners about his girlfriend and her special relationship with their daughter. The convenient story resolutions in Mother’s Day strain credulity to the breaking point, but Marshall understands his target audience (families looking for holiday schmaltz) and delivers a movie that’s like a Hallmark card. Mother’s Day is simplistic and only fitfully amusing, but it does allow the audience to reaffirm their own feelings about dear old mom. 
Continue reading on Mother’s Day: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Miles Ahead: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Don Cheadle

Don Cheadle’s performance is the main reason to see Miles Ahead

C+For the second time in a month, a legendary jazz trumpeter becomes the subject of a biodrama that freely admits to fabricating crucial scenes to give audiences a better understanding of the musician. But, while Born to Be Blue uses fiction to powerfully explain Chet Baker’s heroin addiction, Don Cheadle, the co-writer/director/star of Miles Ahead turns the life of Miles Davis into a bad episode of Starsky & Hutch.

Miles Ahead takes place largely in 1979, when a coked-up and creatively blocked Davis lived in seclusion in New York, unable to finish his latest album. A Rolling Stone reporter, Dave Brill (Ewan McGregor) visits Davis, trying to get an interview, and winds up helping Davis recover session tapes that a sleazy promoter (Michael Stuhlbarg) stole from the musician and hopes to use to finish the album without Davis’ help. During the time spent with Brill, Davis reveals more about himself, as depicted in extensive flashbacks to his earlier career.

Don Cheadle has crafted Miles Ahead as a mosaic, revealing bits and pieces of Davis in a series of largely unrelated scenes going back and forth in time. They show the cruelty in Davis’ life, both what he could inflict on others like his long suffering wife (Emayatzay Corinealdi) and what he suffered as well, such as a scene in which a white cop hassles him right outside the door of the nightclub where the musician was headlining. Dave Bill is a fictitious character, but Davis’ eventual bonding with and confiding in him gives the audience a great look at Davis’ psyche. While the invention of Brill helps flesh out Davis, the equally invented stolen tapes subplot, which takes up nearly half of Miles Ahead, is a huge distraction. Although it’s by far the easiest part of the film to follow, the entire tape scenario, including a shootout involving Davis, Brill, and some of the promoter’s goons, followed by a high-speed chase, is overly melodramatic at best and incredibly silly at worst. Even in those scenes, however, Cheadle is completely captivating and believable as Davis. The audience can see why he would lock himself away for years rather than, in his view, diminish his art. The more ridiculous aspects of Miles Ahead diminish the film’s art as well, but nothing can diminish the excellence of Davis and Cheadle.
Continue reading on Miles Ahead: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

The Huntsman: Winter’s War: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Chris Hemsworth

Chris Hemsworth is a large part of the problem with The Huntsman: Winter’s War

C-Between the spring of 2012, when Snow White and the Huntsman became a modest theatrical hit, and this year’s arrival of its follow-up, The Huntsman: Winter’s War arrives, we have witnessed Frozen, Braveand three Hobbit movies. All of these latter films were more successful, both critically and financially, than Snow White was, so it’s not surprising that the current film’s screenwriters have tried to shoehorn in as many plot elements as possible from the later movies. It’s also not surprising that the result is somewhat of a bloated mess.

The Huntsman: Winter’s War attempts to be both a prequel and sequel to Snow White. In the film’s first half hour, viewers learn that evil queen Ravenna (Charlize Theron) has a younger, nicer sister Freya (Emily Blunt). But a family tragedy makes Freya as cruel as Ravenna and gives the her ability to freeze people and other objects. After Snow White defeats Ravenna, Freya tries to get the power of Ravenna’s magic mirror for herself, and only Eric, the Huntsman (Chris Hemsworth), formerly one of Ravenna’s warriors, and another former warrior, Sara (Jessica Chastain), stand in her way.

Any movie fan seeing the current Huntsman will realize in a minute that Ravenna and Freya are far more sinister versions of Anna and Elsa in Frozen, red-headed Sara is a live action Merida from Brave, and that Eric’s quest for the mirror, accompanied by a band of dwarves, is a variant on the treasure hunt in the Hobbit films. Unfortunately, The Huntsman: Winter’s War is entirely bereft of any of the wit or magic of those other films. Instead, Huntsman relies on its title character, as played by the rather leaden Hemsworth, and struggles to fit all its disparate plot elements in a two-hour movie. At least, Theron has fun as an over-the-top villain (who is too seldom on screen), and she and Blunt look great in a variety of dazzling costumes. The movie’s visual effects are good, especially in the final action sequence, but the overall pace of the film is too slow and the mood too gloomy. Freya’s ice kingdom is the perfect setting for The Huntsman: Winter’s War; the movie is as frozen as the setting.
Continue reading on The Huntsman: Winter’s War: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Everybody Wants Some: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Richard Linklater

No bouquets for Richard Linklater for Everybody Wants Some

CWatching Richard Linklater‘s homage to his youth, Everybody Wants Somebrought back memories of my own college days at about the same time that the film takes place. I soon realized I had something in common with the characters in Linklater’s film. Very little in my college experience would have made an entertaining movie, and very little of what happens to these characters is very entertaining either.

Everybody Wants Some covers the three days before classes begin at a fictional Texas college in the fall of 1980. Jake (Blake Jenner), a freshman pitcher, moves into what’s essentially a baseball team frat house. Over the next three days, he and his new teammates drink a lot, smoke pot a lot, bet on any competition imaginable, attend a single baseball practice, but mostly go to all types of parties and bars and chase (and usually go to bed with) women, 

If this synopsis seems a bit sketchy, that’s because Everybody Wants Some has no real plot, and the dialogue sounds clever only to people who are drunk or high (“You’ve got to embrace your inner strange, man. Just be weird.”) The film also has very few actually funny moments (I laughed four or five times during the entire movie) and amiable but largely interchangeable characters played by largely interchangeable actors, most of whom look like they just walked in off the set of a porn film. The only two characters in Everybody Wants Some who have a semblance of an actual personality are the team stoner, WIlloughby (Wyatt Russell), and the overly hyped-up jerk, Jay (Juston Street). Within 30 minutes of his arrival, Jake is just another one of the guys until he has a last act romance with a drama student (Zoey Deutch), which serves as a welcome break from the nonstop, testosterone-fueled repetitiveness of the rest of the movie.  At least, Everybody Wants Some looks and feels authentic; writer/director Linklater has an ear for period tunes, and the costuming and production design, with settings from a disco to a country bar, are perfect. Everybody Wants Some serves as a pleasant reminder of what campus culture of that era looked and sounded like, but as an actual movie, it fails to make the grade.
Continue reading on Everybody Wants Some: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Criminal: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Kevin Costner

What this movie does to Kevin Costner’s career is criminal

D+Ryan Reynolds‘ career is on a roll now, but he needs to steer clear of movies in which one man’s memory is transplanted into another man’s body. It didn’t work out too well in Self/Less, and the results are even worse, both for Reynolds and the audience, in Criminal

Actually, Reynolds is only on hand for the first 10 minutes of Criminal before his character, CIA agent Bill Pope, is tortured and killed by an international terrorist (Jordi Molla) trying to find the location of a potential doomsday device. In order to get the information Pope had and find the device before the terrorist does, Pope’s boss, Quaker Wells (Gary Oldman), has a scientist, Dr. Franks (Tommy Lee Jones) perform an experimental operation transferring Pope’s brain cells into the body of convicted murderer Jericho Stewart (Kevin Costner). Before he reveals what Pope knew, however, Stewart escapes custody, killing several people, and both the CIA and the terrorists are after him.

The plot of Criminal is completely preposterous, but it’s the type of movie that might be over-the-top fun in the right hands. Unfortunately, director Ariel Vromen plays it far too straight. From the moment the audience realizes that Pope left behind a wife (Gal Gadot) and adorable moppet daughter (Lara Decaro), there’s no doubt where Stewart is headed. Of course, Pope’s implanted memories eventually allow Stewart for the first time in his life to feel emotions for Pope’s loved ones. Before that, however, Costner is fun to watch for a while as he casually and brutally beats up anyone who literally gets in his way. The fun quickly wears off as the nearly non-stop violence is excessively brutal and overdone. Unfortunately, there’s little else besides Costner’s performance to recommend in Criminal. Gary Oldman bellows and blusters through every scene while Tommy Lee Jones compensates by mumbling his lines. The plot is needlessly convoluted. and almost every character in Criminal is, well, criminally stupid, seemingly for the sole purpose of allowing dozens of stunt persons to meet sometimes grisly demises. And, while the movie has plenty of set pieces, Vromen’s handling of them is rather pedestrian. Ironically, Nicolas Cage turned down Costner’s role in this movie; that one fact should tell you all you need to know about whether to see Criminal. 
Continue reading on Criminal: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

The Jungle Book: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Bill Murray

Bill Murray isn’t bearish about The Jungle Book

BDirector Jon Favreau‘s The Jungle Book has two creative fathers: Rudyard Kipling, who wrote the stories on which the movie is based, and Walt Disney, who oversaw production of the 1967 animated version of the children’s classic. In blending these two disparate sources, Favreau and screenwriter Justin Marks opt for thrillingly realistic CGI animals with a touch of Disney’s gentle wit, a mix that’s generally, but not always effective.

The screenplay of the current Jungle Book is closer to the earlier Disney version (this movie was also produced by Disney) than to Kipling’s stories. A young boy, Mowgli (Neel Sethi), has been raised since infancy by wolves, with considerable guidance from the panther Bagheera (voiced by Ben Kingsley). But when Shere Khan (Idris Elba), a vengeful tiger, threatens to kill Mowgli, the boy goes off into the jungle by himself rather than risk the lives of his friends. Eventually, Mowgli returns to confront Shere Khan, hoping to use his human ingenuity and the one thing the tiger fears—fire—to defeat it. 

Disney’s earlier Jungle Book was the last of the studio’s classic hand drawn, brightly illustrated films, and the characters, even the villains, were mostly playful and cartoonish rather than dignified or threatening. Favreau’s film, on the other hand, looks startlingly real, as if it were filmed on location in the depths of the rain forest. In actuality, only Sethi and a couple of other bit actors are real, and everything was “filmed” in a Disney animation studio in Los Angeles. The animals are stunningly rendered and usually look, act, and move naturally. When they do act more like the old Disney characters, The Jungle Book suffers. The worst culprit is King Louie the orangutan (Christopher Walken), who, in this version, is a monstrous creature that towers above Mowgli.  Shere Khan is the best realized character, a surprisingly sympathetic and credible villain, eloquently voiced by Elba. While The Jungle Book‘s efforts at physical comedy are weak, the script gives Bill Murray, as the voice of Baloo the bear, some good one liners, and the film retains the two classic tunes from the earlier version, “The Bare Necessities” and “I Wanna Be Like You.” Jon Favreau doesn’t quite find the right mix of new technology and old Disney, but he has brought Rudyard Kipling’s stories to exciting, realistic, and at times dangerous life.
Continue reading on The Jungle Book: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Born to Be Blue: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Ethan Hawke

Ethan Hawke not looking all that blue

B+Musicians and drugs have had a long and unhappy relationship with each other, one that almost invariably ends in divorce (kicking the habit) or disaster. Jazz trumpeter Chet Baker was a rare exception, a man who managed to produce great music while remaining an admitted heroin addict for the last decades of his life. Writer/director Robert Budreau and star Ethan Hawke explore Baker’s life and art in the fanciful Born to Be Blue

Hawke plays Baker in the 1960’s and 70’s (Born to Be Blue‘s timelines are vague), as the trumpeter tries to recover from a stint in an Italian jail and a severe beating by drug dealers that shatters his front teeth. Baker begins methadone treatment, and, with the aid of dentures, Baker gradually and painfully regains most of his old form. Eventually, Dick, Baker’s former manager (Callum Keith Rennie) persuades record producers to give the trumpeter another audition. 

Director Budreau freely admits that many of the events in Born to Be Blue are completely fictional. Jane (Carmen Ejogo), the actress who becomes Baker’s supportive live-in girlfriend when he goes to California to rebuild his career, is a composite of Baker’s long-time wife and other women in his life. And the climactic performance at Harlem’s legendary Birdland Jazz Club, where Baker begins using heroin again, never occurred—the club closed two years before Baker lost his teeth. Instead of merely recreating key events in Baker’s life in Born to Be Blue, Budreau instead uses real and fictional events to show what made Baker the artist he was, drugs and all. The scene at Birdland in which Baker confesses to Dick that he needs heroin to make him play his best is so powerfully tragic that it might land Hawke an Oscar nomination. Indeed, it’s Hawke’s mournfully passive demeanor and the pain he shows while practicing in the bathtub until his mouth bleeds that make Baker a far more real character that many recent biodrama leads ever became. Born to Be Blue also benefits from a score featuring trumpet solos by Kevin Turcotte, who mimics Baker’s sound almost perfectly (Hawke also took trumpet lessons so he could play in time with the score). Truth may well be stranger than fiction, but Robert Budreau skillfully uses fiction in Born to Be Blue to show audiences the essential truth about Chet Baker.
Continue reading on Born to Be Blue: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Demolition: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Jake Gyllenhaal

Jake Gyllenhaal plays another quirky character in Demolition

CTearing one’s clothes is a sign of mourning in some cultures. However, Davis Mitchell, Jake Gyllenhaal’s character in the new movie Demolition, goes well beyond this as he systematically dismantles his entire house after his wife dies in an auto accident. Eventually, the house falls apart, and so too does the movie.

Davis at first feels nothing after his wife’s death, but after his father-in-law Phil (Chris Cooper) makes a comment about taking things apart before putting them together again, Davis quits going to work and compulsively disassembles or destroys everything he can. Soon, his only human contact is Karen (Naomi Watts), an equally troubled woman who takes Davis in.

Demolition was directed by Jean-Marc Vallée, whose two previous films, Wild and Dallas Buyers Club also featured people who deal with tragedy in their lives in bizarre ways. The difference is that the other two films were based on real people, while Davis Mitchell is merely a symbol. As played by Gyllenhaal, Davis is relatable, a man who eventually realizes he never really felt much about anything before. But instead of giving Davis’ actions some degree of credibility in Demolition, the script by Bryan Sipe merely comes up with increasingly outlandish acts of destruction, culminating in a scene in which Davis persuades Karen’s teenage son (an excellent Judah Lewis) to shoot him while Davis wears a bulletproof vest. Since, in real life, Davis would have been institutionalized halfway through the film, Vallée and Sipe clearly intend Demolition as a metaphorical film. But it’s not funny enough to succeed as dark comedy and not uplifting enough to succeed as magical whimsy, despite a final feel-good scene. The best scenes in Demolition are those between Gyllenhaal and Lewis, which suggest that a more realistic film about Davis’ new “family” might have succeeded. However, that storyline ends abruptly and rather arbitrarily, as if Vallée had decided that the movie had gone on long enough. Gyllenhaal’s performance and chemistry with Lewis make Demolition watchable, but the audience will wish that someone had repaired the damage to the script before filming.
Continue reading on Demolition: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

The Boss: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Melissa McCarthy

Melissa McCarthy is always The Boss

C-Melissa McCarthy has created a number of distinct, often hilarious characters in her rather brief movie career. Michelle Darnell, the fabulously wealthy, amoral self-empowerment entrepreneur turned jailbird that McCarthy plays in her new movie The Boss is actually one of McCarthy’s best creations. Unfortunately, McCarthy’s vision of Darnell soon gets buried under layers of gooey sentimentality and seemingly interminable, mediocre slapstick.

After her conviction for insider trading, Michelle loses almost all her possessions and, after her release from prison, moves in with her former assistant Claire Rawlins (Kristen Bell), the only person who is even grudgingly willing to help her. Michelle regains her zest for life when she attends a Dandelions troop meeting with Claire’s ten-year-old daughter Rachel (Ella Anderson). Seeing how poorly the Dandelions and their cookie sales are run, Michelle forms a rival group, Darnell’s Darlings, that uses her cutthroat business practices to sell competing brownies.

Melissa McCarthy created Michelle Darnell years ago while doing improv theater with the Groundlings and says that the tycoon is her favorite character. So it’s no surprise that when Darnell is on top of the world in the early scenes in The Boss, treating Claire with disdain, the movie is often hilarious. Later, Michelle’s snide sex-laced asides to Rachel and her fellow Dandelions as she plots her comeback are equally funny, if sometimes in R-rated poor taste in the presence of children. But The Boss lacks the courage of its convictions, choosing instead to give Michelle a hidden soft side. She winds up sincerely caring for Claire and Rachel, the family the orphan Michelle never had. The Boss never decides the best way to proceed with Michelle’s character, as she goes back and forth like a yo-yo between her old self and the kinder, gentler one. In addition, the movie contains too many overlong, unfunny slapstick sequences such as a samurai sword fight between Michelle and her ex-boyfriend Renault (Peter Dinklage), who was apparently cast in the mistaken notion that seeing him in a sword fight with Melissa McCarthy would be hilarious. Michelle Darnell is a great character played by the perfect actress. She should be promoted in the right movie; The Boss, on the other hand, should be fired.
Continue reading on The Boss: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Eye in the Sky: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Helen Mirren

Helen Mirren shows her tough side in Eye in the Sky

B+Alfred Hitchcock based many of his best scenes on the principle that suspense results from the audience knowing that something bad is about to happen when the characters don’t. Director Gavin Hood applies that principle to 21st century warfare in his powerful thriller Eye in the Sky, a film that raises moral and political issues at the same time as it keeps the audience on the edge of their seats.  

Eye in the Sky takes place in near real time, as a joint British-U.S. task force tracking a Kenyan terrorist safe house discovers that two suicide bombers inside the house are arming themselves for an attack that could kill dozens of civilians. However, before Col. Powell (Helen Mirren), the commanding officer, can launch a drone strike against the terrorists, Lt. Watts, the American drone pilot (Aaron Paul) spots a little girl selling bread outside the house. Realizing that the missile explosion will likely kill the girl as well, the various government officials in charge of the mission debate whether to proceed with the attack.

The issue in Eye in the Sky is simple—how much collateral damage is acceptable to stop a terrorist attack; its resolution is not. As one government official puts it, “If they kill 80 people, we win the propaganda war. If we kill one child, they do.” But director Hood isn’t just out to explore moral issues here; he’s also constructed a cracker jack thriller, one that ironically is effective because of the separation, both physical and psychological, between the decision makers and the child whose life is at risk. As those in charge ponder possible alternatives that might save the girl’s life, the time in which they can stop the terrorists dwindles. Hood creates a surreal, antiseptic setting, as the various military personnel and government officials sit in safety thousands of miles away, watching through the “eye in the sky,” cameras that show exactly what’s happening at the safe house. Contrasting scenes capture the chaos on the street outside the house where an undercover intelligence operative (Barkhad Abdi) dodges armed militia so he can provide updates. Superb acting magnifies the tension even further. Helen Mirren shows the same gritty determination she displayed two decades ago in her Prime Suspect roles, while the late Alan Rickman, in his last onscreen appearance, is perfectly cast as Powell’s sardonic superior, desperately trying to cajole the officials into making a decision. The ending of Eye in the Sky adds one needless complication that diminishes its emotional impact somewhat, but, nonetheless, the movie squarely strikes both its ethical and entertainment targets.
Continue reading on Eye in the Sky: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories: