Demolition: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Jake Gyllenhaal

Jake Gyllenhaal plays another quirky character in Demolition

CTearing one’s clothes is a sign of mourning in some cultures. However, Davis Mitchell, Jake Gyllenhaal’s character in the new movie Demolition, goes well beyond this as he systematically dismantles his entire house after his wife dies in an auto accident. Eventually, the house falls apart, and so too does the movie.

Davis at first feels nothing after his wife’s death, but after his father-in-law Phil (Chris Cooper) makes a comment about taking things apart before putting them together again, Davis quits going to work and compulsively disassembles or destroys everything he can. Soon, his only human contact is Karen (Naomi Watts), an equally troubled woman who takes Davis in.

Demolition was directed by Jean-Marc Vallée, whose two previous films, Wild and Dallas Buyers Club also featured people who deal with tragedy in their lives in bizarre ways. The difference is that the other two films were based on real people, while Davis Mitchell is merely a symbol. As played by Gyllenhaal, Davis is relatable, a man who eventually realizes he never really felt much about anything before. But instead of giving Davis’ actions some degree of credibility in Demolition, the script by Bryan Sipe merely comes up with increasingly outlandish acts of destruction, culminating in a scene in which Davis persuades Karen’s teenage son (an excellent Judah Lewis) to shoot him while Davis wears a bulletproof vest. Since, in real life, Davis would have been institutionalized halfway through the film, Vallée and Sipe clearly intend Demolition as a metaphorical film. But it’s not funny enough to succeed as dark comedy and not uplifting enough to succeed as magical whimsy, despite a final feel-good scene. The best scenes in Demolition are those between Gyllenhaal and Lewis, which suggest that a more realistic film about Davis’ new “family” might have succeeded. However, that storyline ends abruptly and rather arbitrarily, as if Vallée had decided that the movie had gone on long enough. Gyllenhaal’s performance and chemistry with Lewis make Demolition watchable, but the audience will wish that someone had repaired the damage to the script before filming.
Continue reading on Demolition: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Everest: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Jake Gyllenhaal

Jake Gyllenhaal finds Mt. Everest tougher than a host of paparazzi

BThe best cinematic portrayal of the ill-fated 1996 Mt. Everest expedition during which five climbers died unquestionably would have been a documentary. But since no documentary could adequately capture the actual conditions the climbers encountered, director Baltasar Kormakur‘s technically brilliant docudrama Everest provides a more than acceptable substitute.

Everest focuses on the expedition led by New Zealander Rob Hall (Jason Clarke), the man largely responsible for opening Everest up to wealthy amateur climbers seeking the ultimate adventure. Unlike some of his rival tour guides, including brash American Scott Fischer (Jake Gyllenhaal), Hall stresses safety and providing the optimum experience for his clients. Hall and Fischer actually team up eventually for the final climb. Both Hall and Fischer, along with some of their clients, make it to the summit, but a series of ill-advised decisions and some treacherous weather conditions catch up to them on the way down.

Technically, Everest is stunning, especially in 3D IMAX theaters. Kormakur skillfully mixes footage from Mt. Everest’s own slopes and camps, other location footage in the Italian Alps, and judicious, hard-to-detect CGI to capture the actual experience as much as possible. This thrilling realism comes at a price however, since much of it depicts climbers in heavy mountain gear. Audiences can see how they struggle physically but in many cases don’t even know who the individual climbers are. Of course, that confusion to a large extent matches the actual conditions on the mountain, but it doesn’t make for gripping individual drama. Nor does the screenplay help in that regard, since most of the climbers, including those portrayed by Josh Brolin and John Hawkes are only in Everest for their historical significance. As characters, they are pretty much one-dimensional non-entities. However, audiences do get a good understanding of just why and how things went wrong for the expedition, and a final telephone conversation between Rob Hall and his pregnant wife (Keira Knightley) at home delivers an emotional wallop, more so because it actually happened. By the movie’s end, the sheer spectacle and treachery of Mt. Everest itself and the technical wizardry of the film crew overcome the weakness of the plot, and the result is the best depiction we’re ever likely to see of man’s struggle to reach the top of the world. 
Continue reading on Everest: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Southpaw: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Jake Gyllenhaal

Jake Gyllenhaal doesn’t seem too much the worse for wear here

BFew young actors immerse themselves as completely in their roles as does Jake Gyllenhaal, who lost 30 pounds for his acclaimed role in Nightcrawler. Now, he’s gone in the other direction, working out and bulking up to play a champion boxer in SouthpawAnd once again, the effort pays off in a knockout performance.

Gyllenhaal is world light heavyweight champion Billy Hope, whose world is shattered when his wife Maureen (Rachel McAdams) is killed when a hotel scuffle with another fighter gets out of control. Billy’s life soon goes out of control as well as he loses his title, his sobriety, his money, his manager (Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson), his boxing license, and custody of his daughter Leila (Oona Laurence) in short order. Having hit rock bottom, Billy goes back to the basics, working with trainer Tick Wills (Forest Whitaker), the only person willing to give him a chance.

Southpaw was written by Kurt Sutter, creative force behind Sons of Anarchybut there’s little of the TV series’ freshness here. Instead, Southpaw‘s plot pretty much recycles every boxing film ever made, down to the demanding training montages and the nail-biting, physically damaging “big fight” at the end. And, frankly, Antoine Fuqua‘s direction of the  boxing sequences is nothing more than competent. What rescues Southpaw are the performances, particularly Gyllenhaal’s and Whitaker’s. Once again, Gyllenhaal immerses himself in a role, this one requiring him to be in some sort of pain most of the time. It’s not a subtle role, but what’s most convincing about Gyllenhaal’s performance isn’t how Billy Hope takes punches; it’s the rapport with his daughter. Young Laurence is a natural screen presence, and her character is actually the best written and least clichéd in the film. Forest Whitaker has his moments as well, as a man with demons in his own past that are never fully spelled out in the script. In the long history of boxing movies, Southpaw is no champion, its storyline has been around as long as professional boxing itself. However, Gyllenhaal and Whitaker score enough points with their acting to earn Southpaw a solid decision.  
Continue reading on Southpaw: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories: