The Revenant: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Leonardo di Caprio

Leonardo di Caprio may finally get that elusive Oscar for The Revenant

B+If acting Oscars were awarded for physical suffering, Leonardo DiCaprio would be a shoo-in this year for his performance in The Revenant. The actor endured lengthy outdoor shoots in temperatures well below zero in the Canadian Rockies and still delivered one of the better performances of his career. It appears Oscar voters have noticed. Barring a major upset, DiCaprio is poised to finally win the Oscar, while director Alejandro  G. Inarritu may well join DiCaprio onstage for his second consecutive Oscar win.

The Revenant is the story, based on actual events, of Hugh Glass (DiCaprio), an 1820’s frontiersman acting as a guide for a party of fur trappers. After most of the trappers are killed in a raid by native Americans, Glass himself is attacked by a grizzly bear and later left for dead by his remaining companions. Glass isn’t dead however, but instead makes his way some 200 miles across rugged country to catch up to his former party. Glass is driven by the desire for revenge against John Fitzgerald (Tom Hardy), the trapper who was supposed to stay with Glass until he died but who, instead, tried to kill him and did succeed in killing his son (Forrest Goodluck). 

As depicted by Inarritu and cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki, the northwest frontier of that era is a sometimes stunningly beautiful but often brutal environment whose various inhabitants—Americans, French, and Native Americans—are all capable of extreme savagery. Inarritu succeeds in The Revenant in showing just how incredible Glass’s feat actually was. Along his way back, Glass eats raw buffalo meat, finds shelter inside the hollowed out carcass of a dead horse, and rides for miles down whitewater rapids to avoid pursuers. Leonardo DiCaprio delivers a powerful physical performance as Glass in an almost wordless role. Tom Hardy delivers an equally memorable performance in the more complex role of Fitzgerald, a venal, conniving master at rationalization and self-delusion. Technically, The Revenant is often brilliant, especially the lengthy bear attack scene, one of the most savage and chillingly realistic ever filmed. Inarritu’s only stumble is including distracting mystical sequences involving Glass’s dead wife. These placid, quasi-supernatural scenes are greatly at odds with the stark realism of the rest of the movie. When Inarritu keeps The Revenant grounded in reality, however, it becomes a powerful testament to the human will to survive in the harshest of circumstances.
Continue reading on The Revenant: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Legend: Mini-review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

Tom Hardy

Tom Hardy is twice as good in Legend

B-There are only two reasons to see Legend, an otherwise routine true crime gangster movie about the Kray twins, who were major figures in the British underworld in the 1960’s. Both of those reasons are named Tom Hardy. The actor plays both twins and adds two more memorable characters to his rapidly growing impressive resume.

Legend details the rise and fall of the Krays, who managed to achieve celebrity status in their heyday. Reggie is a charismatic, shrewd businessman who charms Frances (Emily Browning), the sister of one of his underlings, into marrying him. Ronnie is the more violent of the pair, a gay psychopath whose murderous tendencies are barely controlled by medication and by Ronnie. Eventually, both brothers commit separate extremely vicious murders that allow an élite police task force led by Nipper Read (Christopher Eccleston) to arrest them.

Writer/director Brian Helgeland clearly patterns Legend after Martin Scorsese films like Goodfellas and Casino, but something gets lost in the journey across the Atlantic. He seems more intent on recreating the 60’s atmosphere, especially in a number of musical pieces set at the brothers’ swanky London night club, than in telling a story. The supporting characters are ill-defined, with only David Thewlis, as the Krays’ business manager Lesley Payne, making an impression. In addition, Helgeland saddles his actors with such thick accents in the early scenes that American audiences will have difficulty understanding the admittedly far from memorable dialogue. What Helgeland does get right in Legend is the staging of the scenes with both Kray twins. Tom Hardy gives them both different mannerisms, personalities, and speech patterns so that his casting transcends gimmickry, and the scenes involving both twins generate considerable dramatic tension. Hardy turns the twins’ downfall into a form of tragedy, with Reggie unable to bring himself to do what is needed to stop the increasingly uncontrollable Ronnie. The destructively symbiotic nature of their relationship makes the twins as a pair far more interesting than as separate individuals. Otherwise, Legend is merely luridly watchable melodrama, with several brutal murders shown in graphic detail. Brian Helgeland misses his opportunity to make Legend a memorable gangster film, but Tom Hardy takes full advantage of his opportunity to create two memorable film gangsters.
Continue reading on Legend: Mini-review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Mad Max Fury Road: Mini-Review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

 

Charlize Theron

This ultra-glamorous Charlize Theron does not appear in Mad Max Fury Road

A-Let’s cut to the chase here. Mad Max: Fury Road is the best action film in years, one that is destined to show up on all-time lists of such movies. Further, with this film on top of his original Mad Max trilogy, director George Miller cements his reputation as one of the best action directors of all time. Still further, Charlize Theron‘s Imperator Furiosa is second only to Sigourney Weaver‘s Ripley from the Alien movies as the best action heroine of all time.

Given more than 30 years since the original Mad Max trilogy to fine tune his vision of a post-apocalyptic dystopian future, Miller has created a barren desert world in Fury Road in which water, not oil, is the key to power. Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Bourne) controls a vast amount of water at a rocky outcrop called the Citadel and has become a demigod to his followers, most notably a host of hopped up War Boys, including Nux (Nicholas Hoult). Furiosa kidnaps Joe’s prized “possession,” his breeder women, and absconds with them in a heavily armored tanker truck. She soon teams up with Max (Tom Hardy), who has himself escaped from Joe’s clutches, to try to stay one step ahead of Joe’s pursuing armada.

Fury Road has a deceptively simple plot, with the bulk of the movie consisting of several intricately designed and incredibly exciting set pieces. The 30-minute finale is a worthy successor to the climactic set piece in Miller’s earlier The Road Warrior. This time around, however, Miller has the benefit of a vastly increased budget and much improved technology. Miller uses that technology sparingly, however, preferring actual stunt work over CGI and traditional cinematography and deliberate editing that lets viewers understand exactly what’s happening. The production design is also amazingly creative, with vehicles seemingly cobbled together from spare parts that prove to be remarkably versatile in the nonstop combat in which they are engaged. Miller isn’t known for character development, but the main characters here are surprisingly well drawn in one or two scenes. Tom Hardy’s Mad Max has few lines but Miller establishes the character’s emotional baggage through brief flashback moments. Charlize Theron displays her emotions more openly and movingly at times; the movie is really about her quest for redemption. Fury Road winds up being neither a true remake of nor a sequel to any of the original Mad Max movies. Instead, it is an expansion of George Miller’s vision and the art of action film making to a truly exceptional level.
Continue reading on Mad Max Fury Road: Mini-Review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories:

Child 44: Mini-Review


Share This Article: Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinFacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinby feather

Return to Silver Screen Central Home page

 

 

 

Tom Hardy

Tom Hardy delivers a solid, self-deprecating performance in Child 44

B-The real star of the new serial killer drama Child 44 is not its detective, even though Tom Hardy delivers another solid performance. And it’s not the appropriately creepy killer (Paddy Considine) who tortures and murders little boys. Instead, the real star of Child 44 is the Soviet Union in the terrifying days at the end of the Stalin era, a time when the secret police were far scarier than any murderer.

Hardy plays one of those policemen, MGB agent Leo Demidov, whose time is spent chasing political dissidents rather than actual criminals. He loses his cushy post in Moscow, thanks to a jealous underling (Joel Kinnaman) and is banished to a smaller city hundreds of miles away. There, he discovers that the killer of a boy in Moscow has actually been operating around the country freely for years, killing dozens of other children. With the help of his wife (Noomi Rapace), Leo tries to find and stop the killer.

Director Daniel Espinosa‘s focus in Child 44 is on showing the horrors of life in Stalinist Russia, where everyone, guilty or not, lived in terror of being arrested as a political dissident. After being arrested, the real horror began as people were coerced into naming even more names of other dissidents, real or invented. Throughout all this, Davidov tries to do his job but is thwarted by suspicious fellow officers and a system that doesn’t officially recognize that murder exists. Child 44 is an often fascinating movie, built around a sincere, moving performance by Tom Hardy, but it’s a slow-moving and occasionally confusing one as well. Subplots are edited to the point where it’s hard to tell who some secondary characters are, But by the end of Child 44, viewers can understand the fear and paranoia of the era and setting in a way few mainstream films have ever managed.
Continue reading on Child 44: Mini-Review »

Follow Us: FacebooktwitterlinkedinFacebooktwitterlinkedinby feather

Tags:
Categories: